SciCombinator

Discover the most talked about and latest scientific content & concepts.

Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates

OPEN Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 1 Jul 2016

A Eklund, TE Nichols and H Knutsson
Abstract
The most widely used task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses use parametric statistical methods that depend on a variety of assumptions. In this work, we use real resting-state data and a total of 3 million random task group analyses to compute empirical familywise error rates for the fMRI software packages SPM, FSL, and AFNI, as well as a nonparametric permutation method. For a nominal familywise error rate of 5%, the parametric statistical methods are shown to be conservative for voxelwise inference and invalid for clusterwise inference. Our results suggest that the principal cause of the invalid cluster inferences is spatial autocorrelation functions that do not follow the assumed Gaussian shape. By comparison, the nonparametric permutation test is found to produce nominal results for voxelwise as well as clusterwise inference. These findings speak to the need of validating the statistical methods being used in the field of neuroimaging.
Tweets*
1457
Facebook likes*
57
Reddit*
6
News coverage*
52
Blogs*
48
SC clicks
8
Concepts
Familywise error rate, Multiple comparisons, Mathematics, Regression analysis, Medical imaging, Scientific method, Statistical inference, Magnetic resonance imaging
MeSH headings
-
comments powered by Disqus

* Data courtesy of Altmetric.com